Does a woman really exist?

real womanI continue relationship advice columns. It’s an article dedicated to the book “Existe la mujer?” written by Dario Salas Sommer, and which is about a social trap which a woman lives in.

Lets go!

A woman has never been a real woman, just a female. She doesn’t know, what means being a woman, cause in society only a role of female is defined. Besides, womanhood is often confused with biological sexuality, although those are absolutely different things. Signs of female and everything what has to do with a biological structure are given from birth. That’s a free gift of nature, getting without any effort, participation or choice of a woman.

Men choose their way themselves, and that way is not depended on a woman, on the one hand, however, doesn’t exclude it, on the other hand. And women, in a generally accepted opinion, should follow a man, imitating his behavior. In this way competition between a woman and a man begins, and women instinctively try to beat men in anything.

However such attempts are fruitless, cause it’s impossible to beat the person whom you imitate. It turns out that the both sexes follow the same model – male model. For a man, a woman doesn’t become the center of existence, he strives for reaching his own aims. A mental center of a woman is a man, but not her own existence.

In their heart of hearts, women feel themselves as castrated men. They have deep envy to a man’s penis, rivaling and hostility to mother, Oedipus complex towards father. In this way women are born with the feeling, that they are punished, they admire a man, feel themselves lowlier him, depend on him, and that causes a strong endless anxiety. That anxiety appears because of low self-esteem and forces a woman to demonstrate her womanhood by the only possible way – through motherhood.

Of course, discrimination of women existed always, however women themselves voluntarily give up on maturing and development, preferring to obey a man. That is explained by that a dependent person is free from efforts, responsibility and hard work. It’s enough for her to satisfy a defender and thrive in his background.

Women are afraid of their release as strongly as they desire it, and in their heart of hearts deny what they passionately maintain aloud. Equality and responsibility for themselves scare them, however, it’s impossible to put an end to discrimination without that.

woman individualPsychological researched demonstrated that a woman has lost the ability being a separate individual, she determines herself through someone. At first, she is someone’s daughter, then a wife, a mother, and that means she has an inner reality only when someone gives her something.

It’s not surprising, that desiring to achieve equality with men and success in life; women instinctively imitate male behavior, thinking, that the imitation will allow them to achieve equality. Consequences of that are plain: on the one hand, imitation of successful male behavior is, on the other hand women try to increase their sexuality. Therefore, a woman has only female essence, but not a real woman’s essence.

They turn themselves into desired erotic object, thinking, that they become feminine, but that makes their individual development impossible. The majority of women confuse womanhood with sexual attraction.
woman madnessCarlos Castilla del Pino in his book “Four essay about women” maintains:” A usual status of a woman in our society – is peculiar  madness….The most deep form of madness is nonacceptance in themselves that mental dysfunction….Membership of womankind means being CRIPPLE. Reality is that a woman is an object for men, men use women…Fight for life for a woman becomes a fight for a man…Frustration arises during all stages of cognition of her functions by a woman. A reason of woman’s frustration is her passiveness.”

 

 

Christian theology has stigmatized women. At first God created a man, then, when he had noticed, that the man was upset because of loneliness, God took his rib and created a woman. Consequently, a woman comes from a man. However, a turning point is that a woman is responsible for the first sin. God explicitly recognizes woman’s blame and imposes curses on her:

woman religion-I will increase your grief

-You’ll give birth to your children suffering

-I will increase your attraction to your husband, and he’ll rule you

And Adam, who had a ruling role, just was sentenced to working hard and dying too, as Eva was.

In any situation, absolutely different criterions are applied to a woman, compared with a man. When a woman is young, she passionately strives for finding some aim, in order to feel herself determined through the aim. When she is married, doesn’t work, and does only home duties, she feels herself as in prison. If she is married and works, then she tosses and turns between home and work. If she doesn’t have children, she feels despair, however when they exist and a novelty of feelings has gone, then acute melancholy arises, and she feels she has made sacrificed. During and after menopause, it seems to her, that her woman’s opportunities are irretrievably exhausted and there is nothing to wait from the life. If she has a man, the thought, that she can lose him, torments her. If she doesn’t have a man, then she feels herself lost and spurned. A woman will always find what to suffer for.

Female narcissism – is a mechanism of extolling and eulogy of yourself as an erotic object. And really, in basis of woman’s behavior striving for looking as a sexual object is and that is for fulfilling the main task – “to catch a man”.

Even after a woman has gotten married, she continues casting erotic bait for other men. She catches men’s eager glances only in order to satisfy her narcissism.

Female narcissism Female narcissism expects uninterrupted training, concentration and attention, mobilization of physical and mental energy in order to get a desired reward. It’s a bottomless pit. When can narcissus be really satisfied? Never. She feels unsure in herself, because she’s afraid that in a certain moment she will stay without a reward. There always is the opportunity that the person, who gave narcissus his approval, will spot doing that and will pay attention to another object. Narcissus needs a response, and she devises new ways of behavior in order to achieve so needed reward.

Passiveness, masochism and narcissism are characteristic of a woman. Both boys and girls have aggressivity from birth, however they can’t show it in the same way. Boys’ aggressivety can be directed outside, since it isn’t suppressed by society; however girls’ aggressivity should stay inside. That aggressivety is suppressed and is directed against own “individual” and turns in female masochism.

A usual woman can’t avoid masochism, it follows all the main stages of her life: sex, labor, motherhood – everything, one way or another, has to do with suffering. As if women carry out God’s wish – suffering, in order to expiate the first sin.

An enormous obstacle for achieving equality between women and men exists: men have already got male characteristics on a psychological level, since life made such requirements in front of him, however female hasn’t developed her mental and psychological essence, she preferred to stay female and mother. It’s not important, what a man does, he may be a tailor, a cook or a dancer – his sexual role doesn’t depend on his profession, even if his work has been traditionally doing by women. Women, on the contrary, if they become politicians, judges, sailors, take up important posts, usually copy man’s behavior, cause it’s difficult to behave as women.

A woman has fewer opportunities to sublimate her libido, cause sublimation is a stream of erotic energy, which flow through canals of higher level, than biological canals.

Women almost don’t have a tendency towards variations that is genius and degeneration.

Mother’s love turns out a simple human feeling. If to trace relations between a mother and a child over a period of humanity’s history, it’s easy to understand that mother’s instinct is a myth.
We will find no mutual or certain traits, which are characteristics of a mother, more likely her feelings will differ depending on culture, ambitions or frustrations. And how not to come to a conclusion that mother’s love is just a feeling, unstable feeling, which may exist or not, may appear or disappear, may be strong or weak, may be directed at one child or all at children. It depends on a mother, on history of her life and on history of humanity.

Motherhood was considered as the only and completely approved woman’s function over a period of the whole humanity’s history. Women were convinced that the fact of giving birth to a child itself earns the same respect of society as men’s achievements in culture area earn.

Moralists, authorities and doctors launched subtle and cunning propaganda in order women to feel only the best feelings to children and begin to breast-feed. That was reasoning about happiness and equality, which affected women very much.

Over a period of two centuries ideologists promised women the most incredible and wonderful reward, if they would take care of children. “Become good mothers and you’ll be happy and respected.” It’s possible to come to a conclusion from this, that the mother’s role, which, one would think, belongs only to a woman, was formed by men for men.

bad motherMother’s love, unlike a generally accepted opinion, is not free from egoism, at the expense of it a woman gets prestige and recognition, fights against a complex of castration and realizes herself as a female, following the model of behavior, which all over is recognized and exalted.

I maintain that the majority of mothers are bad mothers, cause they don’t have enough of development themselves and haven’t achieved individual self-actualization, therefore, they can’t show an appropriate way for children. Who has nothing, can’t give anything. Such a sad reality was over a period of many centuries: upbringing of children obeyed unruly needs of a mother. It is in the whole world nowadays too.

Role of a mother is formed under enormous pressure of society, which inspires, that a woman can realize herself only through motherhood. Many women understand that too late, at the age of 40 or 50, having a few children and feeling a deep loneliness.

Everything above is not directed against motherhood, it’s just a warning against imposed, ill-considered, neurotic and forced giving birth to children.

It looks as if envy is one from the main characteristic of a usual woman, she is not only offended by men, but rivals other women in man’s attention.

A woman should develop power of her passiveness, mobilizing inner energy, which she caused herself. At the same time, it’s necessary to preserve female foundation – inner susceptibility and give up on all attempted competitions with a man; it’s necessary to concentrate on realization of her own potential, regardless of how that takes its toll on her relationship with a man.

The power, I am talking about, is power of a flexible reed, which bends down, however, remains standing during hurricane, while a mighty oak falls. Might of the power was demonstrated by Gandhi, when he made the British to leave India.

Every woman should choose: being a caricature and a clown or to allow womanhood to sprout inside her soul, I mean the womanhood which hasn’t revealed over a period of the whole humanity’s history.

I hope you haven’t tired very much from reading. Those are not my thoughts, however I am agreed with many of them.

Relationship advice columns Blog gives advice:

1st advice – become free on the basis of intelligent reflection about a concept that sex is sin, and replace it with the conviction, that libido is neutral energy, and only a person’s behavior dyes libido in different colors.

2nd advice – value your sexuality, cause it is equal to man’s sexuality and the both sexes have a mental and biological aptitude with similar importance.

3rd advice – develop yourself and present aims, which are connected not with men, but with your own individual development.

4th advice – completely give up on competitions with men, cause there is no necessity to prove or demonstrate equality with them, trying to beat them or to humiliate them, it’s enough just to devote time to your own development.

5th advice – achieve maturity and self-confidence, have your own opinion, ability for an independent opinion, become responsible and find sexual composure that allows you to get full and real sexual satisfaction.

6th advice – practice hygiene of emotions and imaginativeness, realizing, that destructive ideas and aggressive emotions pollute libido. I want to remark that negative energy weakens as your individual develops and grows.

7th advice – understand that real woman’s power is being flexible, active, susceptible, tender, and gentle.

8th advice – manage your relationship, paying attention to that people have own feelings and thoughts, which should be respected, their rights and expectations are as legal as your own. Such an attitude is born during the process of constant empathy, when a person puts herself in someone’s place.

9th advice – resolutely give up on man’s defense and custody, and understand that in her inner world a woman possesses incredible abilities for realization of woman’s way and desires, for creation successful and happy destiny.

10th advice – give up all attempts to use a man as a tool for achievement of your aims.

I wish you luck!!!

Posted in Psychology of Women and Relationships | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Real love

Hello! I’m continuing to write my relationship advice columns. Today, I’ll turn to the topic of love. That topic will be never closed, cause love is a basis of our world, love is essence of the world, and essence, of course, is endless and vast.

Today’s piece of understanding of essence is about the well-known phrase “Something is respected for something, but we love for no particular reason or its analog “Love is blind”.

As you understand (and if you don’t – it’s a pity) I don’t agree with those popular wisdoms. In this case, it’s not wisdom – it’s stupidity.

It isn’t possible to love for no particular reason. How can it be possible? So, anyone can love anyone? There is no difference – all men and women are similar, and any man can create a family with any woman? Nonsense!

If we really love we love for a certain reason. And only for a certain reason! I, for example (I am the only correct example of everybody whom I spend time with and whom I read) love women for a certain reason, not for no particular reason. I love one woman cause she’s beautiful, another for her wisdom and so on.

And I love them exactly for the reasons, but I do not love them without any reason. Yes, I don’t know, at first, many of their virtues, but I feel that they have them. And something is noticeable straight away. And women love me for certain virtues, which please them very much. But they don’t love without any reason.

Somebody definitely will think – “I see. One more bastard tells about a marriage of convenience. If you knew, how much the thing I was talking about isn’t similar to the words:”Oh! He is a nice person, maybe, get married to him?” (there are many families, which were based on such a principle), you would never think that I am telling about a marriage of convenience. And there is the only convenience – I need the best person in the world. I won’t devote my life to a different person. If you have such a convenience, your happiness will be guaranteed. And such a convenience relieves any girl of loads of problems in searching her love. Remember – only the best. And he’s the only for you. Search him, and don’t waste yourself on “half-measure”. And everything will be great!

However “Love is blind” is not love, it’s illness. It’s the sickly condition, which the majority considers as a love. Although, if you’re really “blind”, so there is nothing to say.

What’s more – human loves himself or herself for a certain reason. If there are no reasons to love yourself, then a human doesn’t love him/herself.

I wish you luck!

Posted in What love is | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Husbands and lovers – male psychology

The topic of psychological types is extensive and ambiguous. Which complex system we wouldn’t have devised, always a lot of counterarguments and exceptional cases will be found. And nevertheless, a certain benefit of typification exists – it gives us the opportunity to take whole better, grouping quotient using a few key categories. The main thing is to remember, that every such a scheme is conditional nature, instrument, but not an end in itself.

Personally, I prefer simple schemes, which group types using very typical signs. They can seem crude, however, thus, they allow to preserve the feeling of reality and not to lose sight of a real person, with his or her individuality.

Such a scheme I’m showing in this article. It is simple and very effective – fairly serious, fairy ironic. If you please, take it accordingly.

With the best seeming variety, only two strongly pronounced strategies, which men use in relationships. Nuances and accents may differ, because of individual experience, however a general routine exists always.

In artistic literature, theater, and cinema, the theme of “husbands and lovers” is wonderfully illustrated by all sorts of variation of love triangles. However, there, where authors of the works devote the main attention to feelings and the irony of fate, it’s possible to notice, that husbands and lovers are different from each other not only situationally, but and psychologically. Actually, we are talking about opposing types of man’s individual.

Pay attention, that using the words “husbands” and “lovers” I don’t mean actual status of a man in a relationship. We are just talking about the strategy, which a man holds with a woman to. It is also important, that the strategy is not a result of a deliberate choice, no, it definitely follows from psychological type of a man.

So, all men, except for some men, whom we’ll talk about later, may by divided on two types – “husbands” and “lovers”. The first in relationships with women, put emphasis on serious prolonged relationships, the second on – easy flirtation, passion and adventurism.

If you have an idea about extraverts and introverts, so, we can say introverts implement the strategy of “husband” and extraverts – the strategy of “lover”. In some specific cases extraverted men turn out to be “husband”, and introverts – “lover”, however that happens only in relative sense. It’s like the first from two introverts can have much typical sign of introversion than the second introvert.

Every from those types has its own characteristic traits, its own strong and weak characteristic, and among women – its lovers. And it’s necessary to understand, that contrary to your own type, it’s very important to have an idea about the second pole, cause normal healthy relationship requires “playing” the both roles. Without that relationship becomes one-sided and quickly degenerates.

Now, actually, let’s turn to a description of the types

A man “lover” 

The classic example of a man lover is Don Juan. He’s a bright extravert-womanizer, conqueror of women’s hearts and ladies’ man. An ardent hunter who gets carried away with the process.

It relationships with women he tries to take an active position, to be full initiative and can say what he wants. He’s insolent in such way which attracts women and allows them to pass responsibility for the affair onto man.

Vain, he searches in his new acquaintance the opportunity to parade. He’s more interested in the fact of winning a victory over a woman, that in relationship with her. If he’d be able – he abolished monogamy on a legal basis.

He’s adventurist in the good and bad sense of that word. He’s always ready for adventures, reaching madness, sometimes.

He can easily infatuate a woman, interest and captivate her. It’s naturally and easy for him. However, having the attraction, he is absolutely not able to give the feeling of peace and definiteness to a woman. She always feels herself in danger with him, cause, she clearly feels, that he will always be a hunter.

He needs from a woman consent and confirmation his own significance. Therefore, he has been always clambering up the stairs of “toughness” conquering getting “cooler” and attractive women. If he doesn’t succeed in developing of “quality” his victories, then quantity comes out on foreground – let the women aren’t the most smart, however he has a lot of them. In this way, a man-“lover” strengthens his damaged self-appraisal, substituting a normal balance of self-importance by the number of his sexual victories (“Pride”)

However, women like men lovers, and even knowing their empty-headed character, they continue giving in to their charms, hoping to harness and bring to heel them.

Near by “lover” a woman feels her sexual attraction better and indulges her female self-esteem. The first time, when a man gets what he wants, the second time – when he abandons her, and she feels herself having the right to accuse all men of infidelity, and call them bastards, rats and so on.

Relationships with a man-lover – are always mutual “playing” pride. Factually, in that case, may bу absence of sex. However, it always hangs in the air.

A Man – “husband”

Typical “husband” is a domestic, obedient man. It’s a quiet, serene introvert, who has chosen a peace with the only woman, instead of adventures with many.

In relationships with women he is serious; at times do the point of absurdity. In every woman he sees a potential wife, and therefore from the first minutes takes care of her busily and constantly searches for her approval and confirmation of her feelings.

Because his unwarranted seriousness, he can’t absolutely flirt, doesn’t feel  woman’s mood and doesn’t notice woman’s flirting. Therefore, he turns out in a passive position in relationship, waiting for a woman the first steps or, at least, clear instruction what to do next.

“Husband” always tries to be a gentleman and consider a lofty attitude to women his the main virtue. He knows how to court and conquer women by patience and constancy. Instead of passion and affair, he offers a woman eternal love and the perspective of marriage.

However, at the same time, he wants to get from a woman the same what “lover” wants too – psychological satisfaction. However, instead of sexual victory over a woman, it’s more important for him to conquer her love, for the sake of which he’s ready to be defeated. That is a relationship with a woman here, becomes the means to suppress some psychological pain and unsettled state, too.

In relationships a man-“husband” is gentle, affectionate and romantic. He surrounds a woman with concern and is ready to carry out her every whim, if only she would give him love. He’s ready to obey woman’s desires, to the detriment of his own desires. He’s predictable and guided, and therefore, gives a woman the feeling of reliability and immunity. And when a woman wants to “build a nest”, she searches for such a type of relationships.

In exchange, “husband” wants to get love and comprehensive taking of a woman. So he searches for a tender mother, who’ll give him the feeling, which he liked in childhood. He’s ready to exchange his male freedom for the chance to pass weight of responsibility onto a woman and to get rid of the feeling of inferiority complex.

Well, in the best his display, easily giving a woman the feeling stability and definiteness, he opens for her the way to maternity. Loving, caring, domestic man – what does a woman need else, when we are talking about creating a family?

A man by itself

As it was said in the beginning, a man doesn’t choose to be a “husband” or a “lover”. As a rule, to the moment of puberty, when a boy does the first steps in relationships with girls, a choice of general strategy is determined. Introverts begin playing knights, extraverts – cheeky vulgar persons.

In this case, as in other similar cases, type of behavior the much expressed, the fewer psyches is balanced. We can say that “Don Juans” and “knights” are two extremes of the same personality neurosis, revealing in relationships with women.

Disbalance of self-appraisal + extraversion = “lover”

Disbalance of self-appraisal + introversion = “husband”

The stronger the disbalance is, the deeper a man gets stuck in strategy and the ruder and one-sided his behavior is. And, on the contrary, the more balanced his psyche is, the freer a man chooses strategy.

However, it will never be the situation, when a man becomes for a woman both “husband” and “lover”. “Don Juan” and “knight” are surely the symptoms of an unsure of himself man. So, until a man unsure of himself, he is rigidly tied to the general strategy, however when a self-appraisal is balanced, he just doesn’t need to play “Don Juan” or “knight”.

Resolving the inner problem, a man comes out outside of the described scheme and becomes neither one nor other – just a man. And, we can say, that it’s the brink, on the other side of which healthy relationship becomes possible, the relationship which is based on a mutual respect and comprehensive assumption.

All men heard and took a part in debates about contradiction of woman’s character. Offered typology illustrates the thesis very bright. The thing is that every woman waits from every man, he to be the both “husband” and “lover” for her. There are exceptions here too, however those are rare and those are the woman with a balanced self-appraisal.

Women, because their problematic self-appraisal, have to search for confirmation of their own value via relationships with men. So, actually, they need men “lovers”. However another side of woman’s soul needs stability, reliability and predictability, as a basis for creating a family and pregnancy. And here pole changes – for such a type of relationships a man “husband” is needed.

Therefore, in practice, it’s very easy to observe the situation, where a woman plays around or marries “lover”, indulges her self-esteem, lights up in her sexual attraction, but then, when passion fades, begins attempts to changes a man-“lover” to a man-“husband”. And, usually, everything ends with hard mutual disappointment. “Lover” wants to preserve freedom and to stay “lover”, but a woman can’t resign herself to the feeling of uncertainty, cause that severely criticize her self-appraisal. Relationship is wrecked and turns to porridge of mutual accusation and insults.

Or, it’s possible another variant, when a woman finds a caring “husband”, but in time gets tired from his worry and begins searching for a lover, cause the subordinated “husband” can’t satisfy female pride. A woman tries to require power and independence from “husband”, however, usually, that gives nothing, and the woman abandons the man, hoping to find another, who will be both “lover” and “husband”.

What way out from the outcome exists?

There is one and a half ways out. The first – the both partners need to change their self-appraisal and stop searching in relationship for self-assertion and consolation. When a man isn’t tied to the actual role, and a woman doesn’t need in solving her problems at the expense of a man, relationship becomes absolutely different – simple, clear and honest, without any mutual dependence.

One more gap – is to allow to each other a freedom in a relationship. Man is allowed to hunt, woman is allowed to have a lover. But that variant isn’t suited to an independent way out from the situation, cause requires from the both sides overcoming complexes and refusal from monopoly rights on each other. That’s a little easier, but few are ready for it, as a variant it’s possible to cheat, however that suits few.

 

Conclusions the situation isplain, but I won’t voice them – leave them to you for independent examination

Posted in Psychology of Men and Relationships | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment